FIA Guide



Topic: Fiber Characterization and

Testing Long Haul, High Speed Fiber Optic Networks

Table of Contents: The FOA Reference Guide To Fiber Optics



Fiber Characterization and Testing Long Haul, High Speed Fiber Optic Networks:

Chromatic Dispersion, Polarization Mode Dispersion and Spectral Attenuation


One of the big advantages of fiber optics is its capability for long distance high speed communications. Attenuation at long wavelengths is low. Fibers can be fusion spliced with virtually no loss. High-powered lasers and fiber amplifier regenerators mean long distances are easily obtained.

However over very long distances, new factors in fiber performance become important. Chromatic dispersion, the dispersion caused by light of different wavelengths, and polarization mode dispersion, caused by the polarization in fibers, become factors limiting fiber links. Even the variation of fiber attenuation with wavelength can become an issue. All 3 may need testing on long distance networks to ensure proper link performance.

These are NOT the only important tests - they are IN ADDITION to careful inspection of connectors and the installed cable plant (neatness and lack of stress in cables and patchcords), insertion loss testing with a source and power meter or OLTS and OTDR testing. You can review those tests in the testing pages.

Chromatic Dispersion
Chromatic dispersion (CD) is caused by the fact that singlemode glass fibers transmit light of different wavelengths at different speeds.  The ratio of the speed of light in a medium to the speed in a vacuum defines the index of refraction or refractive index of the material. For optical fiber, the effective index of refraction is about 1.45, so the speed of light in glass is about 2/3 the speed of light in a vacuum. But the index of refraction, and thereby the speed of light in the fiber, is a function of the wavelength of light, the principle we all know from seeing a prism break light into a spectrum.

Most sources used in long distance fiber optic links are lasers which have very little spectral width. And fibers are optimized for the wavelength of use. Both these factors minimize the effects of chromatic dispersion but cannot totally stop it. As the pulse proceeds down the fiber, the light of longer wavelength travels slightly faster  and spreads the pulse out as shown here.

Chromatic Dispersion


What Causes Chromatic Dispersion
There are two factors that cause chromatic dispersion: material dispersion and waveguide dispersion.
Material dispersion is caused by the variation of the index of refraction in a given material, glass in this case, over wavelength. Looking at the graph below, the variation of the index of refraction over the entire spectrum covered by fiber optics may seem small, only a few percent, but when you are dealing with very high speed pulses over very long distances it can add up.


Chromatic Dispersion - material dispersion

Waveguide Dispersion
Waveguide dispersion is a bit more complex. In singlemode fiber, the wavelength of the light is not that much bigger than the core of the fiber and (we’ll leave out the complex physics) as a result the light traveling down the fiber actually travels in an area that exceeds the diameter of the core, which we call the “mode field diameter” of the fiber. The mode field diameter is a function of the wavelength of the light, with longer wavelengths traveling in a larger mode field diameter. Thus part of the light is traveling in the geometric core of the fiber and part is traveling in the cladding. Since the core is made of a higher index of refraction glass than the cladding, the light in the cladding travels faster than the light in the core. Longer wavelengths have larger mode field diameters so they suffer more material dispersion.

Chromatic Dispersion  - waveguide dispersion


Engineered Dispersion in Fibers
Material and waveguide dispersion have opposite variations with wavelength, so careful design of the fiber materials and index profiles allows the fiber to have a “zero dispersion wavelength.” On either side of that wavelength, dispersion increases. The importance of chromatic dispersion is a function of the application for the fiber. As a result, different SM fibers have been developed for the requirements of specific applications. Here are a listing of the types of fibers currently in use.


Description ITU Spec. Application
Standard Singlemode Fiber G.652  Original SM fiber, optimized for 1310 nm, OK for use at 1550
Low Water Peak Fiber G.652  Processed to reduce water absorption at 1400 nm for DWDM
Dispersion-Shifted Fiber G.653 Optimized for 1550 nm
Cutoff Shifted Fiber G.654 Optimized for low loss at 1500 to 1600 nm for long haul submarine cables
Non-Zero Dispersion-Shifted Fiber G.655 Optimized for 1550 nm, DWDM
Wideband Non-Zero Dispersion-Shifted Fiber G.656 Wideband, DWDM from 1460 to 1625 nm


Dispersion Compensation
As mentioned earlier, the dispersion characteristics of a fiber can be manipulated by the materials and design of the fiber. In fact, fibers can be made that have CD inverse to the typical fibers and of a greater magnitude. So a length of dispersion compensation fiber can be added to a link, usually at a repeater (optical amplifier) that reverses the CD of the fiber span before it. Such fibers tend to have high loss and bend sensitivity, so alternatively a dispersion compensator made from a specialized component called a bragg grating can be used, but it has a more limited use and higher cost.

dispersion compensation

Chromatic Dispersion in the Cable Plant
As with any other component, optical fiber performance parameters can vary from batch to batch, so a long concatenated cable plant with many different fibers will have a end-to-end chromatic dispersion which is an integration of the CD of all the individual fibers. Therefore fiber in long distance links will probably be tested for CD after installation or before upgrading a link to higher bit rate electronics.

Testing Chromatic Dispersion
There are several methods used for testing CD in fibers. All involve testing at a variety of wavelengths using several discrete sources of various wavelengths, a tunable laser or a broadband source with a monochromator in the receiver and measuring the relative speeds of the signals. The data taken at discrete wavelengths is then analyzed to calculate the dispersion in terms of ps/nm/km.
Test methods use phase delay or time of flight and generally require access to both ends of the fiber as well as a second fiber for synchronization of the two test instruments at either end. However, an OTDR test method is also used where traces are taken at several discrete wavelengths and CD can be calculated from the data obtained from the traces, allowing testing in the field from one end of the fiber.
All these methods have international standards for the test methods, instruments and data analysis.


Standards Description
IEC 60793-1-42 Measurement methods and test procedures—chromatic dispersion
ITU-T G.650.1 Definitions and test methods for linear,  deterministic attributes of
singlemode fiber and cable
TIA FOTP-175-B Chromatic dispersion measurement of single-mode optical fibers
GR-761-CORE Generic criteria for chromatic dispersion test sets


Phase Shift Method

Chromatic Dispersion  - phase test


Pulse Delay Method

Chromatic Dispersion - pulse delay test


OTDR Test Method


Chromatic Dispersion  - OTDR Test




Polarization Mode Dispersion
Polarization mode dispersion (PMD) is a bit more complex. Polarization is a phenomenon of light traveling in a medium as a wave with components at right angles. Some materials, like a glass optical fiber, have a different index of refraction for each of those components of the light wave, which is called birefringence. And a different index of refraction means light travels at a different speed, so in the simplest visualization, PMD in fiber looks like the drawing below, where each component of the polarized light travels at a different speed, causing dispersion. The magnitude of PMD in a fiber is expressed as this difference, which is known as the differential group delay (DGD) and called Δτ (“delta Tau”).
Polarization Mode Dispersion


PMD is caused by the birefringence of the fiber which can be influenced by two factors, material birefringence and waveguide birefringence, similar to CD, but more complex. Waveguide birefringence is caused by geometrical variations in the fiber such as concentricity or ellipticity.  Material birefringence is mainly caused by stress on the fiber.

Waveguide Birefringence


PMD - Waveguide Birefringence


Material Birefringence

PMD - Material Birefringence


PMD is a complex issue in installed optical fiber. In a long concatenated fiber, each fiber can have different waveguide and material birefringence characteristics caused by the random characteristics of each fiber in the  link and variations of the stress on the fiber. Variations are particularly noticeable in aerial fiber, where the PMD may vary considerably according to temperature and wind speed buffeting the fiber!
PMD causes pulse broadening and/or jitter in the received electrical signal, potentially causing errors in the reception of the signals. Since the PMD can vary over time, an extra margin of 1 to 3 dB is often added to the power budget to accommodate variation in PMD.
PMD is an important issue as data rates on long distance links increases to 40 Gb/s and 100 Gb/s. Unfortunately, there are no reliable compensation schemes for PMD, so the only solution is to test links to be upgraded for PMD using one or more of the standardized test methods.



Testing PMD
PMD is generally tested for fibers during manufacture or when being cabled. In the field, it is common to test PMD on newly installed fibers which are intended for operation at high speeds, generally above 2.5 Gb/s or when upgrading fibers installed some time in the past. Since PMD varies over time, a single test becomes an average and tests at a later time may be done for comparison.
There are a number of commonly used test methods for PMD, some of which are limited to the manufacturing environment, while others can be used in the field. Essentially, all the test instruments have a source which can vary the polarization of the test signal and a measurement unit that can analyze polarization changes.

PMD testing


Here are descriptions of the methods and relevant standards.

Description Test Method Standards
PMD for single-mode optical fibers by the Fixed Analyzer method Extrema Counting (EC)
Fourier Transform (FT)
FOTP-113
PMD measurement for single-mode optical fibers by Stokes parameter measurements Jones Matrix Eigen-analysis (JME)
Poincaré Sphere Analysis (PSA)
FOTP-122
PMD measurement for single-mode optical fibers and cable assemblies by
Interferometry
Traditional Interferometry(TINTY)
General Interferometry (GINTY)
FOTP-124
Guideline for PMD and DGD measurement in single-mode fiber optic components and devices 
FOTP-196
Measurement methods and test procedures—polarization mode dispersion Fixed Analyzer measurement method (EC / FT)
Stokes evaluation method (JME / PSA)
Interferometry method (TINTY)
IEC 60793-1-48
Portable PMD test sets used for analyzing single-mode fiber
GR-2947-CORE
Definitions and test methods for statistical and nonlinear attributes of single-mode
fiber and cable
Stokes parameter evaluation technique (JME & PSA)
State of Polarization method (SOP)
Interferometric methods ( TINTY & GINTY)
Fixed Analyzer technique (EC / FT / Cosine Fourier Analysis) 
ITU-T G.650.2


PMD testing is not an easy, reproducible, accurate test. The measurement uncertainty can be as high as 10-20%, as shown by testing done within international standards committees. These committees have concluded that all these measurement techniques are permissible, that there are factors in making these measurements that are not well understood, and the methods of data analysis are not without question.
All this uncertainty of PMD measurements has the effect of making comparisons between tests and test methods difficult. Variations are particularly high on tests of older fiber links. Presentations of field have even shown that variations in PMD can be correlated to wind speed for aerial cables.

PMD testing needs to be done on long links but the data must be analyzed intelligently to be of real use.

Spectral Attenuation
With the develoment of low water peak fibers, the possibility of transmission from 1260 to 1675 nm has been considered. This results from careful manufacturing of the fiber to reduce the water in the fiber (in the form of OH- ions) that causes higher spectral attenuation at around 1244 and 1383 nm.

low water peak fiber

Since one may want to use available fibers  of unknown spectral attenuation for CWDM which uses lasers from 1260 to 1670 nm in 20 nm windows, it becomes necessary to test for spectral attenuation to verify the usability. At the water peaks, legacy fibers may have attenuation coefficients around 2 dB/km while low water peak fibers may be as low as 0.4 dB/km.
Testing spectral attenuation is done per TIA/EIA-455-61 or IEC 61300-3-7 with broadband sources like LEDs and a spectrum analyzer on the receiving end of the fiber. Calibration is done with a short fiber length, the the instrument calculates the spectral attenuation on a long length being tested. The measurement of spectral attenuation uses instruments similar to those used for CD testing by the phase shift method, so some instruments do both measurements at one time.

 

 
The FOA wishes to acknowledge the invaluable reference materials on these subjects in the JDSU Reference Guides to Fiber Optic Testing. These highly recommended books can be downloaded from the JDSU website.




 


(C)2010-2, The Fiber Optic Association, Inc.